Login / Signup

The challenge of standardizing CAR-T cell monitoring: A comparison of two flow-cytometry methods and correlation with qPCR technique.

Juan Luis Valdivieso-ShephardElisabet Matas-PérezSilvia García-BujalanceIsabel Mirones-AguilarBerta González-MartínezAntonio Pérez-MartínezEduardo López-GranadosAna Martínez FeitoElena Sánchez Zapardiel
Published in: Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology (2024)
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a breakthrough in hematologic malignancies, such as acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Monitoring this treatment is recommended, although standardized protocols have not been developed yet. This work compares two flow cytometry monitoring strategies and correlates this technique with qPCR method. CAR-T cells were detected by two different flow-cytometry protocols (A and B) in nine blood samples from one healthy donor and five B-ALL patients treated with Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah®, USA). HIV-1 viral load allowed CAR detection by qPCR, using samples from seven healthy donors and nine B-ALL patients. CAR detection by protocol A and B did not yield statistically significant differences (1.9% vs. 11.8% CD3 + CAR+, p = 0.07). However, protocol B showed a better discrimination of the CD3 + CAR+ population. A strong correlation was observed between protocol B and qPCR (r = 0.7, p < 0.0001). CD3 + CAR+ cells were detected by flow cytometry only when HIV-1 viral load was above 10 4 copies/mL. In conclusion, protocol B was the most specific flow-cytometry procedure for the identification of CAR-T cells and showed a high correlation with qPCR. Further efforts are needed to achieve a standardized monitoring approach.
Keyphrases