Login / Signup

OPTIKNEE 2022: consensus recommendations to optimise knee health after traumatic knee injury to prevent osteoarthritis.

Jackie L WhittakerAdam Geoffrey CulvenorCarsten Bogh JuhlBjørnar BergAlessio BriccaStephanie Rose FilbayPætur HolmErin MacriAnouk P UrhausenClare L ArdernAndrea M BruderGarrett Scott BullockAllison M EzzatMichael A GirdwoodMelissa J HaberfieldMick HughesLina Holm Holm IngelsrudKarim M KhanChristina Y LeJustin M LoscialeMatilde LundbergMaxi MiciakBritt Elin ØiestadBrooke E PattersonAnu M RäisänenSøren Thorgaard SkouJonas Bloch ThorlundClodagh ToomeyLinda K TruongBelle L van MeerThomas James WestJames Justin YoungL Stefan LohmanderCarolyn A EmeryMay Arna RisbergMarienke van MiddelkoopEwa M RoosKay M Crossley
Published in: British journal of sports medicine (2022)
The goal of the OPTIKNEE consensus is to improve knee and overall health, to prevent osteoarthritis (OA) after a traumatic knee injury. The consensus followed a seven-step hybrid process. Expert groups conducted 7 systematic reviews to synthesise the current evidence and inform recommendations on the burden of knee injuries; risk factors for post-traumatic knee OA; rehabilitation to prevent post-traumatic knee OA; and patient-reported outcomes, muscle function and functional performance tests to monitor people at risk of post-traumatic knee OA. Draft consensus definitions, and clinical and research recommendations were generated, iteratively refined, and discussed at 6, tri-weekly, 2-hour videoconferencing meetings. After each meeting, items were finalised before the expert group (n=36) rated the level of appropriateness for each using a 9-point Likert scale, and recorded dissenting viewpoints through an anonymous online survey. Seven definitions, and 8 clinical recommendations (who to target, what to target and when, rehabilitation approach and interventions, what outcomes to monitor and how) and 6 research recommendations (research priorities, study design considerations, what outcomes to monitor and how) were voted on. All definitions and recommendations were rated appropriate (median appropriateness scores of 7-9) except for two subcomponents of one clinical recommendation, which were rated uncertain (median appropriateness score of 4.5-5.5). Varying levels of evidence supported each recommendation. Clinicians, patients, researchers and other stakeholders may use the definitions and recommendations to advocate for, guide, develop, test and implement person-centred evidence-based rehabilitation programmes following traumatic knee injury, and facilitate data synthesis to reduce the burden of knee post-traumatic knee OA.
Keyphrases