Login / Signup

Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Tapentadol Immediate Release in Bunionectomy: A Meta-Analysis.

Lorenzo Franco-de la TorreEduardo Gómez-SánchezOthoniel Hugo Aragon-MartinezAdriana Hernández-GómezDiana Laura Franco-GonzálezJuan Manuel Guzmán-FloresÁngel Josabad Alonso-CastroVinicio Granados-SotoMario Alberto Isiordia-Espinoza
Published in: Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) (2023)
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the analgesic effect of different doses of tapentadol immediate release (IR) and its adverse effects after a bunionectomy. Pubmed, Cochrane, Lilacs, Medline, and Imbiomed were used to identify abstracts of scientific publications related to the keywords of this systematic review (PROSPERO ID CRD42023437295). Moreover, the risk of bias in all included articles was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. Data on the sum of pain intensity, total pain relief, global assessment, and adverse effects were extracted. The statistical method of inverse variance with means difference was used to evaluate the numerical data and the Mantel-Haenszel and Odd Ratio test to analyze the dichotomous data. In addition, the number needed to treat, the number needed to harm, and the 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A qualitative evaluation ( n = 2381) was carried out according to the conclusions of the authors. Tapentadol ( n = 1772) was more effective in relieving postoperative pain than the placebo ( n = 609) after a bunionectomy. In addition, the analgesic efficacy of IR tapentadol ( n = 1323) versus the placebo ( n = 390) was evaluated in a total of 1713 patients using a global evaluation of the treatments. All three doses of IR tapentadol showed better results compared to the placebo after a bunionectomy. Finally, the adverse effects have a direct relationship with the dose, and the greatest number of adverse effects are most observed with tapentadol IR 100 mg ( n = 2381). It is concluded that tapentadol IR (100 mg) leads to the best satisfaction score in this meta-analysis.
Keyphrases