Login / Signup

Comparison of Weekly Paclitaxel Regimens in Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: A Single Institution Retrospective Study.

Laurence MorinLouis-Philippe GrenierNicolas FoucaultÉric LévesqueFrançois FabiEve-Lyne LanglaisAlexandra SebastianelliMarianne LavoieMarc LalancetteMarie PlanteMahukpe Narcisse Ulrich SingboVincent Castonguay
Published in: Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) (2024)
Weekly paclitaxel (WP) is a chemotherapeutic cornerstone in the management of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma. Multiple WP dosing regimens have been used clinically and studied individually. However, no formal comparison of these regimens is available to provide objective guidance in clinical decision making. The primary objective of this study was to compare the cumulative dose of paclitaxel delivered using 80 mg/m 2 /week, administered using either a 3 weeks out of 4 (WP3) or a 4 weeks out of 4 (WP4) regimen. The secondary objective was to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with both regimens, including efficacy and toxicity parameters. Our retrospective cohort comprised 149 patients harboring platinum-resistant ovarian cancer treated at the CHU de Québec from January 2012 to January 2023. WP3 and WP4 reached a similar cumulative dose (1353.7 vs. 1404.2 mg/m 2 ; p = 0.29). No significant differences in the clinical outcomes were observed. The frequency of dose reduction was significantly higher for WP4 than WP3 (44.7% vs. 4.9%; p < 0.01), mainly due to treatment intolerance from toxicity (34.0% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.01). Our data suggest that a WP3 regimen delivers a similar cumulative dose to WP4, hence offering a better efficacy profile without compromising efficacy.
Keyphrases
  • decision making
  • newly diagnosed
  • oxidative stress
  • ejection fraction
  • randomized controlled trial
  • clinical trial
  • prognostic factors
  • big data
  • machine learning
  • study protocol
  • patient reported