Login / Signup

Reporting quality of clinical trial protocols: a repeated cross-sectional study about the Adherence to SPIrit Recommendations in Switzerland, CAnada and GErmany (ASPIRE-SCAGE).

Dmitry GryaznovBelinda von NiederhäusernBenjamin SpeichBenjamin KasendaElena Ojeda-RuizAnette BlümleStefan SchandelmaierDominik MertzAyodele OdutayoYuki TomonagaAlain AmstutzChristiane Pauli-MagnusViktoria GloySzimonetta LohnerKarin BischoffKatharina WollmannLaura RehnerJoerg J MeerpohlAlain NordmannKatharina KlatteNilabh GhoshAla Taji HeraviJacqueline WongNgai ChowPatrick HongKimberly A McCord-De IacoSirintip SricharoenchaiJason Walter BusseArnav AgarwalRamon SaccilottoMatthias SchwenkglenksGiusi MoffaLars HemkensSally HopewellErik von ElmMatthias Briel
Published in: BMJ open (2022)
In 2012, industry-sponsored RCT protocols were reported more comprehensively than investigator-sponsored protocols. After publication of the SPIRIT checklist, investigator-sponsored protocols improved to the level of industry-sponsored protocols, which did not improve.
Keyphrases
  • clinical trial
  • randomized controlled trial
  • type diabetes
  • emergency department
  • open label
  • clinical practice
  • study protocol
  • metabolic syndrome
  • quality improvement
  • skeletal muscle
  • double blind
  • glycemic control