Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopy for Mild and Moderate Pediatric Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Yun Chul ParkYoung Goun JoYoung-Jun KiWu-Seong KangJoongsuck KimPublished in: Journal of clinical medicine (2022)
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopy for pediatric patients with abdominal trauma. Relevant articles were obtained by searching the MEDLINE PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases until 7 December 2021. Meta-analyses were performed using odds ratio (OR) for binary outcomes, standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcome measures, and overall proportion for single proportional outcomes. Nine studies examining 12,492 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis showed younger age (SMD -0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.52 to -0.42), lower injury severity score (SMD -0.62, 95% CI -0.67 to -0.57), shorter hospital stay (SMD -0.55, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.50), less complications (OR 0.375, 95% CI 0.309 to 0.455), and lower mortality rate (OR 0.055, 95% CI 0.0.28 to 0.109) in the laparoscopy group compared to the laparotomy group. The majority of patients were able to avoid laparotomy (0.816, 95% CI 0.800 to 0.833). There were no missed injuries during the laparoscopic procedures in seven eligible studies. Laparoscopy for stable pediatric patients showed favorable outcomes in terms of morbidity and mortality. There were no missed injuries, and laparotomy could be avoided for the majority of patients.
Keyphrases
- systematic review
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- meta analyses
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- robot assisted
- randomized controlled trial
- prognostic factors
- case control
- machine learning
- cardiovascular disease
- emergency department
- patient reported outcomes
- metabolic syndrome
- coronary artery disease
- adipose tissue
- big data
- insulin resistance