Canadian and Dutch doctors' roles in assistance in dying.

According to the Canadian law legalizing physicians to provide medical assistance in dying (MAID) under certain circumstances, the patients alone determine if their suffering cannot be relieved under conditions "that they consider acceptable." This contrasts with the laws on MAID in the Netherlands, which require that physicians only grant access to MAID if they concur with the patient that there are no other potential means of alleviating the suffering. In the Netherlands, when a doctor believes that other means to reduce the suffering exist, they must be tried before having access to MAID. This criterion is often applied and is considered an essential precaution to ensure that lives are not ended prematurely when other viable interventions exist. The Canadian emphasis on the patient's right to decide whether to try potential alternatives a physician may suggest, such as palliative care, instead of dying by MAID, gives patients the liberty to make informed decisions, even when they may not seem to be in their best interest. This contrasts with the belief in the Netherlands that the state has an obligation to protect citizens from making decisions that are not in their best interest, such as choosing to die when the "intolerable suffering" can be diminished sufficiently for the person to abandon the desire to end the suffering by dying. The Canadian parliament, when they consider expanding access to MAID, should incorporate the Dutch due care safeguards to ensure that death is not the solution when other ways of reducing suffering exist.