Improved couple satisfaction and communication with marriage and relationship programs: are there gender differences?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zeinab JavadivalaHamid AllahverdipourMohammad Asghari JafarabadiSomayeh AzimiNeda GilaniVijay Kumar ChattuPublished in: Systematic reviews (2021)
Due to the high effect of the therapy programs on CRS and enhancement program on CRC in the current meta-analysis, the priority of their utilizations in interventions, especially by psychologists and mental health professionals, should be emphasized. Therefore, mental health planning in communities to develop MRP and care for couples' health should be given special attention to men's health. Due to the high heterogeneity of the results and with scanty literature in this specific domain, we are uncertain about their actual effect. However, well-designed RCTs with a larger sample size would be beneficial in closely examining the effect of MRPs on CRS and CRC.
Keyphrases
- mental health
- public health
- systematic review
- healthcare
- mental illness
- health information
- physical activity
- working memory
- stem cells
- meta analyses
- quality improvement
- randomized controlled trial
- health promotion
- risk assessment
- social media
- middle aged
- climate change
- chronic pain
- mesenchymal stem cells
- health insurance
- human health
- intimate partner violence
- affordable care act
- pain management