Preventing and Treating Pain and Anxiety during Needle-Based Procedures in Children with Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Michael J McNeilXimena Garcia QuinteroMiriam GonzalezYawen ZhengCecilia Ugaz OlivaresRoxana MoralesÉrica BoldriniDébora Rebollo de CamposDaiane FerreiraKamalina CoopasamyJoliza CanebaMaria Louisa PadernillaStefan FriedrichsdorfJustin N BakerPaola FriedrichPublished in: Cancers (2024)
Introduction : Children with cancer experience significant pain and anxiety during needle-based procedures. Undertreated pain in children has long-lasting consequences and reduces the efficacy of subsequent analgesic efforts. A validated quality improvement (QI) intervention, known as the "Children's Comfort Promise", includes (1) topical anesthetics, (2) sucrose or breastfeeding for infants, (3) comfort positioning, and (4) distraction techniques, and has been shown to be highly effective in decreasing procedural pain and anxiety in children. However, there is limited data about the adoption, adaptation, and implementation of these interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods : A QI pilot project utilizing the Model for Improvement of the "Global Comfort Promise" was implemented in four global pediatric cancer hospitals (Lima, Peru; Barretos, Brazil; Pietermaritzburg, South Africa; and Manila, Philippines). Between August 2021 and January 2023, the pilot sites identified a specific aim, co-designed the measurement strategy with St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, and adopted, adapted, and implemented the project at their individual sites. Results : A total of 2,185 different procedures were recorded in the first year of implementation. Most patients were less than 10 years old (60.5%) and solid tumors (37.9%) were the most common diagnosis. Overall, healthcare professionals (98.3%) were satisfied with the procedures. Parents and patients reported that only 33.7% of patients experienced pain during the procedure. All (100%) parents and patients felt the healthcare teams adequately addressed their child's pain. Median self-reported adherence to ≥2 interventions was 98.0%. Challenges to the implementation of the QI initiative included lack of training, turnover of the medical staff, maintaining staff enthusiasm, and access to topical anesthetics. Each site had unique change ideas to implement the initiative. Conclusions : This multi-site, multi-country QI initiative was feasible and was successfully adopted, adapted, and implemented in the LMIC context to improve procedural pain in children (Global Comfort Promise). Additionally, this intervention resulted in high satisfaction of both healthcare professionals and patients/families. Further work is needed to overcome the challenges of topical anesthetic access and education of the workforce. Additional plans include modifying the Global Comfort Promise to include high-quality communication and expanding to additional sites with further refinement of the implementation strategy.
Keyphrases
- quality improvement
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- chronic pain
- young adults
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- peritoneal dialysis
- primary care
- pain management
- neuropathic pain
- randomized controlled trial
- prognostic factors
- south africa
- squamous cell carcinoma
- clinical trial
- big data
- machine learning
- spinal cord
- patient safety
- postmenopausal women
- deep learning
- public health
- ultrasound guided
- bone mineral density
- study protocol
- squamous cell
- electronic health record
- depressive symptoms
- antiretroviral therapy