Body Contouring as Gender-Affirming Surgery in Transgender Patients: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.
Alejandra AristizábalMaría Ríos-SánchezJoseph M EscandónDean DeRobertsEnrique ArmentaGabriel Del CorralAndrés MascaroOscar J ManriquePublished in: Journal of clinical medicine (2024)
Background: There is an increasing demand for body contouring and gender-affirming surgeries, and so is the need to compare outcomes between techniques. Gender dysphoria is a discrepancy between gender identity and the sex assigned at birth. One way to address this is to perform procedures to enable patients to look according to their desired gender identity. Gaps in knowledge regarding the best approaches and which surgical techniques yield the most patient satisfaction remain. This article summarizes up-to-date studies, including upper and lower body contouring procedures. Methods: A systematic review was performed using terms related to body contouring in gender-affirming surgery for transgender patients. All articles included surgical and patient-reported outcomes following either chest or lower body contouring procedures. Results : 15 studies, including trans male chest wall contouring, trans female breast augmentation, and lower body contouring, with 1811 patients, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The double incision (DI) techniques consistently resected more tissue and had better BODY Q scores than non-overweight patients. Bleeding was increased in periareolar, semicircular, and obese patients with DI techniques. Nipple depigmentation and sensation loss were more common with double-incision-free nipple graft techniques (DIFNG). Lower body contouring patients had average implant sizes bigger than 200 mL and reported 2 gluteal implant displacements, 1 exposure, and one rupture. Eight percent of patients who underwent large-volume fat grafting reported dissatisfaction due to fat reabsorption. Conclusions: The debate between the double incision and periareolar techniques continues. Variations of the DIFNG technique continue to be the most common approach; however, nipple depigmentation and loss of sensation are also more common with it. Regarding increased bleeding with periareolar techniques, there is still no evidence that hormonal therapy may be playing a role in it. For lower-body trans female contouring, implants could help with the longevity of contouring results in patients needing large-volume fat grafting. There is an increasing evaluation of gender-affirming body contouring patient-reported outcomes; however, there is still a need for a validated way to report satisfaction scores in lower body contouring. Validated surveys could help identify surgical candidates based on satisfaction patterns, specifically for transgender and non-binary patients.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- patient reported outcomes
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- prognostic factors
- type diabetes
- stem cells
- metabolic syndrome
- minimally invasive
- staphylococcus aureus
- bariatric surgery
- atrial fibrillation
- skeletal muscle
- hepatitis c virus
- body mass index
- weight gain
- patient satisfaction
- ionic liquid
- fatty acid
- bone marrow
- preterm birth
- men who have sex with men