Login / Signup

Are Estimates of the Health Opportunity Cost Being Used to Draw Conclusions in Published Cost-Effectiveness Analyses? A Scoping Review in Four Countries.

Laura Vallejo-TorresBorja García-LorenzoLaura Catherine EdneyNiek Waltherus StadhoudersIjeoma P EdokaIván Castilla RodríguezLidia García-PérezRenata LinertováCristina Valcárcel-NazcoJonathan Karnon
Published in: Applied health economics and health policy (2021)
The adoption of HOC-based CETs by identified published CEAs has been uneven across the four analysed countries, most likely due to underlying differences in their decision-making processes. Our results also reinforce a previous finding indicating that CETs might be endogenously selected to fit authors' conclusions.
Keyphrases
  • decision making
  • public health
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • meta analyses
  • electronic health record
  • health information
  • randomized controlled trial
  • health promotion
  • human health
  • climate change