Clinician approaches to spinal manipulation for persistent spinal pain after lumbar surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.
Robert James TragerClinton J DanielsKevin W MeyerAmber C StoutJeffery A DusekPublished in: Chiropractic & manual therapies (2023)
Clinicians using SMT for PSPS-2 most often apply non-manual-thrust SMT to the lumbar spine, while chiropractors are more likely to use lumbar-manual-thrust SMT relative to other providers. As non-manual-thrust SMT may be gentler, the proclivity towards this technique suggests providers are cautious when applying SMT after lumbar surgery. Unmeasured variables such as patient or clinician preferences, or limited sample size may have influenced our findings. Large observational studies and/or international surveys are needed for an improved understanding of SMT use for PSPS-2. Systematic review registration PROSPERO (CRD42021250039).
Keyphrases
- minimally invasive
- systematic review
- spinal cord
- coronary artery bypass
- case report
- meta analyses
- pain management
- randomized controlled trial
- electronic health record
- surgical site infection
- machine learning
- big data
- coronary artery disease
- spinal cord injury
- artificial intelligence
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- deep learning
- data analysis