Endoscopic Versus Conservative Therapy for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer with Adherent Clot: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Azizullah BeranYasir Al-AbboodiAbdul Mounaem MajzoubSami GhazalehWasef SayehMouhand F H MohamedKhaled ElfertMohammed MhannaEleazar Montalvan-SanchezRami MusallamFouad JaberUmer BhattiKhaled AbdeljawadMohammad Al-HaddadPublished in: Digestive diseases and sciences (2023)
Our meta-analysis demonstrates that endoscopic therapy was overall associated with lower rates of rebleeding (overall and 30-day), mortality (overall and 30-day), need for surgery, and LOS, compared to conservative therapy for the management of bleeding ulcers with adherent clots. However, subgroup analysis of RCTs showed that endoscopic therapy was associated with numerically lower but statistically non-significant rates of overall rebleeding and a statistically lower rate of need for surgery compared to conservative therapy with similar overall mortality rates. Combined treatment with thermal therapy and injection therapy was the most effective treatment modality in reducing rebleeding risk. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to validate our findings.