Login / Signup

Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends.

Veronika V EremaAnna Y YakovchikDaria A KashtanovaZanda V BochkaevaMikhail V IvanovDmitry V SosinLorena R MatkavaVladimir S YudinValentin V MakarovAnton A KeskinovSergey A KraevoySergey M Yudin
Published in: International journal of molecular sciences (2022)
There is no single universal biomarker yet to estimate overall health status and longevity prospects. Moreover, a consensual approach to the very concept of aging and the means of its assessment are yet to be developed. Markers of aging could facilitate effective health control, more accurate life expectancy estimates, and improved health and quality of life. Clinicians routinely use several indicators that could be biomarkers of aging. Duly validated in a large cohort, models based on a combination of these markers could provide a highly accurate assessment of biological age and the pace of aging. Biological aging is a complex characteristic of chronological age (usually), health-to-age concordance, and medically estimated life expectancy. This study is a review of the most promising techniques that could soon be used in routine clinical practice. Two main selection criteria were applied: a sufficient sample size and reliability based on validation. The selected biological age calculators were grouped according to the type of biomarker used: (1) standard clinical and laboratory markers; (2) molecular markers; and (3) epigenetic markers. The most accurate were the calculators, which factored in a variety of biomarkers. Despite their demonstrated effectiveness, most of them require further improvement and cannot yet be considered for use in standard clinical practice. To illustrate their clinical application, we reviewed their use during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Keyphrases
  • clinical practice
  • healthcare
  • public health
  • mental health
  • systematic review
  • randomized controlled trial
  • health promotion
  • risk assessment
  • human health