Exploring the ethics of tuberculosis human challenge models.
Abie RohrigJosh MorrisonGavriel KleinwaksJonathan PughHelen McShaneJulian SavulescuPublished in: Journal of medical ethics (2023)
We extend recent conversation about the ethics of human challenge trials to tuberculosis (TB). TB challenge studies could accelerate vaccine development, but ethical concerns regarding risks to trial participants and third parties have been a limiting factor. We analyse the expected social value and risks of different challenge models, concluding that if a TB challenge trial has between a 10% and a 50% chance of leading to the authorisation and near-universal delivery of a more effective vaccine 3-5 years earlier, then the trial would save between 26 400 and 1 100 000 lives over the next 10 years. We also identify five important ethical considerations that differentiate TB from recent human challenge trials: an exceptionally high disease burden with no highly effective vaccine; heightened third party risk following the trial, and, partly for that reason, uniquely stringent biosafety requirements for the trial; risks associated with best available TB treatments; and difficulties with TB disease detection. We argue that there is good reason to consider conducting challenge trials with attenuated strains like Bacillus Calmette-Guérin or attenuated Mycobacterium tuberculosis .
Keyphrases
- mycobacterium tuberculosis
- phase iii
- study protocol
- endothelial cells
- pulmonary tuberculosis
- clinical trial
- phase ii
- induced pluripotent stem cells
- healthcare
- public health
- randomized controlled trial
- open label
- emergency department
- escherichia coli
- big data
- climate change
- real time pcr
- deep learning
- human immunodeficiency virus
- electronic health record
- artificial intelligence
- double blind
- placebo controlled
- label free
- adverse drug