Digoxin use and outcomes after myocardial infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Ville KytöAntti SarastePäivi RautavaAleksi TornioPublished in: Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology (2022)
Digoxin is used for rate control in atrial fibrillation (AF), but evidence for its efficacy and safety after myocardial infarction (MI) is scarce and mixed. We studied post-MI digoxin use effects on AF patient outcomes in a nationwide registry follow-up study in Finland. Digoxin was used by 18.6% of AF patients after MI, with a decreasing usage trend during 2004-2014. Baseline differences in digoxin users (n = 881) and controls (n = 3898) were balanced with inverse probability of treatment weight adjustment. The median follow-up was 7.4 years. Patients using digoxin after MI had a higher cumulative all-cause mortality (77.4% vs. 72.3%; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.19; confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.32; p = 0.001) during a 10-year follow-up. Mortality differences were detected in a subgroup analysis of patients without baseline heart failure (HF) (HR: 1.23; p = 0.019) but not in patients with baseline HF (HR: 1.05; p = 0.413). Cumulative incidences of HF hospitalizations, stroke and new MI were similar between digoxin group and controls. In conclusion, digoxin use after MI is associated with increased mortality but not with HF hospitalizations, new MI or stroke in AF patients. Increased mortality was detected in patients without baseline HF. Results suggest caution with digoxin after MI in AF patients, especially in the absence of HF.
Keyphrases
- atrial fibrillation
- end stage renal disease
- heart failure
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- prognostic factors
- randomized controlled trial
- peritoneal dialysis
- physical activity
- type diabetes
- metabolic syndrome
- body mass index
- coronary artery disease
- acute heart failure
- cardiovascular events
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- study protocol
- blood brain barrier
- weight gain
- direct oral anticoagulants
- cerebral ischemia