Meningioma systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an assessment of reporting and methodological quality.
Alan M GeorgeShubhi GuptaSumirat M KeshwaraMohammad A MustafaConor Scott GillespieGeorge E RichardsonAmy C SteeleAmir H Z NajafabadiLinda DirvenAnthony G MarsonAbdurrahman I IslimMichael D JenkinsonChristopher Paul MillwardPublished in: British journal of neurosurgery (2022)
The reporting and methodological quality of meningioma evidence syntheses was poor. Established guidelines and critical appraisal tools may be used as an adjunct to aid methodological conduct and reporting of such reviews, in order to improve the validity and transparency of research which may influence clinical practice.