Login / Signup

Comparative susceptibility of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV across mammals.

Meng LiJuan DuWeiqiang LiuZihao LiFei LvChunyan HuYichen DaiXiaoxiao ZhangZhan ZhangGaoming LiuQi PanYang YuXiao WangPingfen ZhuXu TanPaul A GarberXuming Zhou
Published in: The ISME journal (2023)
Exploring wild reservoirs of pathogenic viruses is critical for their long-term control and for predicting future pandemic scenarios. Here, a comparative in vitro infection analysis was first performed on 83 cell cultures derived from 55 mammalian species using pseudotyped viruses bearing S proteins from SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV. Cell cultures from Thomas's horseshoe bats, king horseshoe bats, green monkeys, and ferrets were found to be highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV pseudotyped viruses. Moreover, five variants (del69-70, D80Y, S98F, T572I, and Q675H), that beside spike receptor-binding domain can significantly alter the host tropism of SARS-CoV-2. An examination of phylogenetic signals of transduction rates revealed that closely related taxa generally have similar susceptibility to MERS-CoV but not to SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped viruses. Additionally, we discovered that the expression of 95 genes, e.g., PZDK1 and APOBEC3, were commonly associated with the transduction rates of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped viruses. This study provides basic documentation of the susceptibility, variants, and molecules that underlie the cross-species transmission of these coronaviruses.
Keyphrases
  • sars cov
  • respiratory syndrome coronavirus
  • single cell
  • poor prognosis
  • cell therapy
  • coronavirus disease
  • copy number
  • long non coding rna
  • current status
  • drug induced