Login / Signup

Helping cancer patients quit smoking using brief advice based on risk communication: A randomized controlled trial.

William H C LiMan-Ping WangK Y HoKatherine K W LamDerek Y T CheungYannes T Y CheungT H LamSophia S C Chan
Published in: Scientific reports (2018)
This randomized controlled trial aimed to examine the effectiveness of a smoking cessation intervention using a risk communication approach. A total of 528 smoking cancer patients were randomly allocated either into an intervention group (n = 268) to receive brief advice based on risk communication by a nurse counselor or a control group (n = 260) to receive standard care. Subjects in both groups received a smoking cessation booklet. Patient follow-ups were at 1 week and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. No significant differences were found in self-reported point-prevalence 7-day abstinence between the intervention and control groups at 6 months (15.7% vs 16.5%; OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.59-1.50). The rate of at least 50% self-reported reduction of smoking at 6 months, was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (16.8% vs 12.3%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.88-2.35). The biochemically validated quit rate at the 6-month follow-up was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (5.2% vs 3.8%; OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.60-3.16). These data suggest that advice based on risk communication was not effective for quitting but improved the rate of smoking reduction among smoking cancer patients.
Keyphrases
  • smoking cessation
  • randomized controlled trial
  • replacement therapy
  • study protocol
  • healthcare
  • primary care
  • systematic review
  • clinical trial
  • risk factors
  • machine learning
  • chronic pain
  • double blind