Login / Signup

Urban working groups in the IAEA's model testing programmes: overview from the MODARIA I and MODARIA II programmes.

Kathleen M ThiessenMarija Zlata BoznarThomas W CharnockSohan L ChouhanLucia FederspielBoštjan GrašičZoran GrsicJan HelebrantSebastian HettrichJiří HůlkaWon Tae HwangSunita KambojVolodymyr KorolevychPetr KučaJoeun LeeFrancesco ManciniPrimož MlakarLuc PatrylMargit Pattantyús-ÁbrahámTamir ReisinGert SdouzKampanart SilvaShogo TakaharaBee Kiat TayHartmut WalterYankovich TamaraCharley Yu
Published in: Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection (2022)
The IAEA's model testing programmes have included a series of Working Groups concerned with modelling radioactive contamination in urban environments. These have included the Urban Working Group of Validation of Environmental Model Predictions (1988-1994), the Urban Remediation Working Group of Environmental Modelling for Radiation Safety (EMRAS) (2003-2007), the Urban Areas Working Group of EMRAS II (2009-2011), the Urban Environments Working Group of (Modelling and Data for Radiological Impact Assessments) MODARIA I (2013-2015), and most recently, the Urban Exposures Working Group of MODARIA II (2016-2019). The overarching objective of these Working Groups has been to test and improve the capabilities of computer models used to assess radioactive contamination in urban environments, including dispersion and deposition processes, short-term and long-term redistribution of contaminants following deposition events, and the effectiveness of various countermeasures and other protective actions, including remedial actions, in reducing contamination levels, human exposures, and doses to humans. This paper describes the exercises conducted during the MODARIA I and MODARIA II programmes. These exercises have included short-range and mid-range atmospheric dispersion exercises based on data from field tests or tracer studies, hypothetical urban dispersion exercises, and an exercise based on data collected after the Fukushima Daiichi accident. Improvement of model capabilities will lead to improvements in assessing various contamination scenarios (real or hypothetical), and in turn, to improved decision-making and communication with the public following a nuclear or radiological emergency.
Keyphrases