Login / Signup

Retrospective Multicenter Comparison Between Viabahn Covered Stent-Grafts and Supera Interwoven Nitinol Stents for Endovascular Treatment in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: The ARMADILLO Study (Adjusted Retrospective coMparison of scAffolDs In caLcified LesiOns).

Kazunori HorieMitsuyoshi TakaharaTatsuya NakamaAkiko TanakaKazuki TobitaNaoki HayakawaShinsuke MoriYo IwataKenji Suzuki
Published in: Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2022)
Covered stent-graft (CSG) and Supera interwoven nitinol stent (SPS) are reliable endovascular devices in calcified femoropopliteal lesions. This retrospective multicenter study compared the clinical outcomes between the two devices. After propensity score matching, 150 matched patients with no remarkable intergroup difference in baseline characteristics. The primary patency at 1 year was not statistically different between the CSG and SPS group (81.4% vs. 71.2%, p=0.32). There was also no significant difference in freedom from target lesion revascularization (82.8% vs. 77.6%, p=0.28) and overall survival rate (88.6% vs 87.2%, p=0.81). The two devices showed the similar efficacy in calcified femoropopliteal lesions.
Keyphrases
  • cross sectional
  • endovascular treatment
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • coronary artery bypass grafting
  • acute coronary syndrome
  • free survival
  • aortic dissection