Mi-CARE: Comparing Three Evidence-Based Interventions to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening among Ethnic Minorities within Three Different Clinical Contexts.
Karriem S WatsonKatherine Y TossasYazmin San MiguelNicole GastalaLiliana G San MiguelScott GrumeretzVida HendersonRobert WinnMasahito JimboKeith B NaylorMegan E GregoryYamilé MolinaAshley M HughesPublished in: International journal of environmental research and public health (2023)
Multiple evidence-based interventions (EBIs) have been developed to improve the completion of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening within Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and other safety net settings in marginalized communities. Little effort has been made, however, to evaluate their relative effectiveness across different clinical contexts and populations. To this end, we tested the relative effectiveness of three EBIs (mailed birthday cards, lay navigation, and provider-delivered education) among a convenience sample of 1252 patients (aged 50-75 years old, who were due for CRC screening and scheduled for a visit at one of three clinics within a network of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in the United States. To be eligible for the study, patients had to identify as African American (AA) or Latino American (LA). We compared the effects of the three EBIs on CRC screening completion using logistic regression. Overall, 20% of the study population, an increase from a baseline of 13%, completed CRC screening. Clinical demographics appeared to influence the effectiveness of the EBIs. Mailed birthday reminders appeared to be the most effective within the multi-ethnic clinic ( p = 0.03), provider-delivered education within the predominantly LA clinic ( p = 0.02), and lay navigation within the predominantly AA clinic ( p = 0.03). These findings highlight the importance of understanding clinical context when selecting which evidence-based interventions to deploy.