Login / Signup

Outcomes of haploidentical vs matched sibling transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission.

Armin RashidiMehdi HamadaniMei-Jie ZhangHai-Lin WangHisham Abdel-AzimMahmoud AljurfAmer AssalAshish BajelAsad BasheyMinoo BattiwallaAmer M BeitinjanehNelli BejanyanVijaya Raj BhattJavier Bolaños-MeadeMichael ByrneJean-Yves CahnMitchell CairoStefan CiureaEdward CopelanCorey CutlerAndrew DalyMiguel-Angel DiazNosha FarhadfarRobert Peter GaleSiddhartha GangulyMichael R GrunwaldTheresa HahnShahrukh K. HashmiGerhard Carl HildebrandtH Kent HollandNasheed HossainChristopher G KanakryMohamed A Kharfan-DabajaNandita KheraYener KocHillard M LazarusJong-Wook LeeJohan MaertensRodrigo MartinoJoseph P McGuirkReinhold MunkerHemant S MurthyRyotaro NakamuraSunita NathanTaiga NishihoriNeil PalmisianoSagar S PatelJoseph PidalaRebecca OlinRichard F OlssonBetul OranOlle RingdénDavid RizzieriJacob RoweMary Lynn SavoieKirk R SchultzSachiko SeoBrian C ShafferAnurag SinghMelhem SolhKeith Stockerl-GoldsteinLeo F VerdonckJohn L WagnerEdmund K WallerMarcos De LimaBrenda M SandmaierMark R LitzowDaniel J WeisdorfRizwan RomeeWael Saber
Published in: Blood advances (2020)
HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) has improved donor availability. However, a matched sibling donor (MSD) is still considered the optimal donor. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we compared outcomes after Haplo-HCT vs MSD in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Data from 1205 adult CR1 AML patients (2008-2015) were analyzed. A total of 336 patients underwent PT-Cy-based Haplo-HCT and 869 underwent MSD using calcineurin inhibitor-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The Haplo-HCT group included more reduced-intensity conditioning (65% vs 30%) and bone marrow grafts (62% vs 7%), consistent with current practice. In multivariable analysis, Haplo-HCT and MSD groups were not different with regard to overall survival (P = .15), leukemia-free survival (P = .50), nonrelapse mortality (P = .16), relapse (P = .90), or grade II-IV acute GVHD (P = .98). However, the Haplo-HCT group had a significantly lower rate of chronic GVHD (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.48; P < .001). Results of subgroup analyses by conditioning intensity and graft source suggested that the reduced incidence of chronic GVHD in Haplo-HCT is not limited to a specific graft source or conditioning intensity. Center effect and minimal residual disease-donor type interaction were not predictors of outcome. Our results indicate a lower rate of chronic GVHD after PT-Cy-based Haplo-HCT vs MSD using calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis, but similar other outcomes, in patients with AML in CR1. Haplo-HCT is a viable alternative to MSD in these patients.
Keyphrases