Login / Signup

Towards good modelling practice for parallel hybrid models for wastewater treatment processes.

Loes VerhaegheJan VerwaerenGamze KirimSaba DaneshgarPeter A VanrolleghemElena Torfs
Published in: Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research (2024)
This study explores various approaches to formulating a parallel hybrid model (HM) for Water and Resource Recovery Facilities (WRRFs) merging a mechanistic and a data-driven model. In the study, the HM is constructed by training a neural network (NN) on the residual of the mechanistic model for effluent nitrate. In an initial experiment using the Benchmark Simulation Model no. 1, a parallel HM effectively addressed limitations in the mechanistic model's representation of autotrophic bacteria growth and the data-driven model's incapability to extrapolate. Next, different versions of a parallel HM of a large pilot-scale WRRF are constructed, using different calibration/training datasets and different versions of the mechanistic model to investigate the balance between the calibration effort for the mechanistic model and the compensation by the NN component. The HM can improve predictions compared to the mechanistic model. Training the NN on an independent validation dataset produced better results than on the calibration dataset. Interestingly, the best performance is achieved for the HM based on a mechanistic model using default (uncalibrated) parameters. Both long short-term memory (LSTM) and convolutional neural network (CNN) are tested as data-driven components, with a CNN HM (root-mean-squared error (RMSE) = 1.58 mg NO 3 -N/L) outperforming an LSTM HM (RMSE = 4.17 mg NO 3 -N/L).
Keyphrases
  • wastewater treatment
  • convolutional neural network
  • neural network
  • primary care
  • clinical trial
  • randomized controlled trial
  • working memory
  • single cell
  • quality improvement