This paper reviews current knowledge on minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). Although it has significant advantages, such as less postoperative pain, short hospital stay, quick return to work, better cosmetics, and less infection rate, there are also disadvantages. The long learning curve, the need for special instruments and types of equipment, high costs, lack of tactile sensation and biplanar imaging, some complications that are hard to treat, and more radiation to the surgeon and surgical team are the disadvantages.Most studies remark that the outcomes of MISS are similar to traditional surgery. Although patients demand it more than surgeons, we predict the broad applications of MISS will replace most of our classical surgical approaches.
Keyphrases
- minimally invasive
- robot assisted
- postoperative pain
- end stage renal disease
- healthcare
- chronic kidney disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- quality improvement
- high resolution
- patient reported outcomes
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- emergency department
- type diabetes
- radiation induced
- coronary artery disease
- randomized controlled trial
- acute coronary syndrome
- acute care
- radiation therapy
- adipose tissue
- patient reported