The United States experience with diagnosing and treating esophageal cancer during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: A retrospective cohort study.
Christina M StuartRobert A MeguidMichael R BronsertSalvador Rodriguez FrancoBenedetto MungoRichard D SchulickAna L GleisnerMartin D McCarterJohn D MitchellAdam R DyasPublished in: International journal of cancer (2023)
The downstream effects on healthcare delivery during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine how the healthcare environment surrounding the pandemic affected the oncologic care of patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer. This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients in the National Cancer Database (2019-2020). Patients with esophageal cancer diagnoses were divided into pre-pandemic (2019) and pandemic (2020) groups. Patient demographics, cancer-related variables, and treatment modalities were compared. Among 26,231 esophageal cancer patients, 14,024 patients (53.5%) were in the pre-pandemic cohort and 12,207 (46.5%) were in the pandemic cohort. After controlling for demographics, patients diagnosed during the pandemic were more likely to have poorly differentiated tumors (odds ratio [OR] 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.42), pathologic T3 disease compared to T1 (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.53), positive lymph nodes on pathology (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.14-1.64), and to be pathologic stage IV (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.29-1.76). After controlling for oncologic characteristics, patients diagnosed during the pandemic were more likely to require at least two courses of systemic therapy (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.48-2.14) and to be offered palliative care (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.22). While these patients were offered curative therapy at lower rates, this became non-significant after risk-adjustment (p = .15). The pandemic healthcare environment was associated with significantly increased risk-adjusted rates of patients presenting with advanced esophageal cancer. While this led to significant differences in treatment, most of these differences became non-significant after controlling for oncologic factors.
Keyphrases
- sars cov
- end stage renal disease
- healthcare
- coronavirus disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- palliative care
- chronic kidney disease
- peritoneal dialysis
- prostate cancer
- radiation therapy
- stem cells
- social media
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus
- robot assisted
- patient reported outcomes
- neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- patient reported
- pain management
- electronic health record
- health insurance
- advanced cancer
- quality improvement
- sentinel lymph node