Login / Signup

Differences in calculated percentage improvement versus patient-reported percentage improvement in pain scores: a review of spinal cord stimulation trials.

Jonathan M HagedornTimothy Ray DeerNicholas C CanzanelloStephen M CovingtonDarrell R SchroederMarkus A BendelSusan M MoeschlerWilliam Michael Hooten
Published in: Regional anesthesia and pain medicine (2021)
Although the two methods are highly correlated, there is substantial lack of agreement between patient-reported and calculated percentage improvement in pain scale, suggesting that these measures should not be used interchangeably for spinal cord stimulator trial outcome assessment. This emphasizes the need for improved metrics to better measure patient response to neuromodulation therapies. Additionally, patient-reported percentage improvement in pain was found to be higher than calculated percentage improvement in pain, potentially highlighting the multidimensional experience of pain and the unpredictability of solely using Numeric Rating Scale scores to assess patient outcomes.
Keyphrases
  • patient reported
  • chronic pain
  • neuropathic pain
  • spinal cord
  • pain management
  • spinal cord injury
  • clinical trial
  • case report
  • randomized controlled trial
  • postoperative pain