Login / Signup

A qualitative study of family members' perspectives regarding decision-making for nursing home residents' care.

Anne Helene MortensenDagfinn NådenDag KarterudAnn GallagherVibeke Lohne
Published in: International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being (2024)
The family members of residents and the nursing home caregivers disagreed about the significance of upholding resident autonomy to respect residents' dignity. The family members held that not all instances where residents refused care reflect autonomy situations as care refusal often does not reflect the resident's true values and standards but rather, stems from barriers that render necessary care actions difficult. In situations where residents refuse essential care or when the refusal does not align with the residents second-order values, the family members suggested that caregivers strive to understand the causes of refusal and seek non-coercive ways to navigate it. Hence, the family members seemed to endorse the use of soft paternalism in nursing homes to safeguard residents' wellbeing and dignity.
Keyphrases
  • palliative care
  • quality improvement
  • healthcare
  • advanced cancer
  • pain management
  • decision making
  • affordable care act
  • patient safety
  • health insurance