Comparison of methods to engage diverse stakeholder populations in prioritizing PrEP implementation strategies for testing in resource-limited settings: a cross-sectional study.
Sarah HicksFelix AbunaBen OdhiamboJulia C DettingerNancy NgumbauLaurén GómezJoseph SilaGeorge OketchEnock SifunaBryan J WeinerGrace C John-StewartJohn KinuthiaAnjuli D WagnerPublished in: Implementation science communications (2023)
Both experienced and inexperienced stakeholder participants' strategy rankings tended to prioritize strategies perceived as feasible. Small group discussions focused on feasibility and effectiveness revealed moderately different priorities than individual rankings. The strategy bundling approach, though less time- and resource-intensive, was not effective. Future research should further compare the relative effectiveness and pragmatism of methodologies to prioritize implementation strategies.