Effect of remdesivir post hospitalization for COVID-19 infection from the randomized SOLIDARITY Finland trial.
Olli P O NevalainenSaana HorstiaSanna LaakkonenJarno RutanenJussi M J MustonenIlkka E J KallialaHanna AnsakorpiHanna-Riikka KreiviPauliina KuuttiRaphael BuenoSeppo ParkkilaErja-Leena PaukkeriMarkus PerolaNegar PourjamalAndreas RennerTuomas RosbergTaija RutanenJoni Savolainennull nullJari K HaukkaGordon H GuyattKari A O TikkinenPublished in: Nature communications (2022)
We report the first long-term follow-up of a randomized trial (NCT04978259) addressing the effects of remdesivir on recovery (primary outcome) and other patient-important outcomes one year after hospitalization resulting from COVID-19. Of the 208 patients recruited from 11 Finnish hospitals, 198 survived, of whom 181 (92%) completed follow-up. At one year, self-reported recovery occurred in 85% in remdesivir and 86% in standard of care (SoC) (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.47-1.90). We infer no convincing difference between remdesivir and SoC in quality of life or symptom outcomes (p > 0.05). Of the 21 potential long-COVID symptoms, patients reported moderate/major bother from fatigue (26%), joint pain (22%), and problems with memory (19%) and attention/concentration (18%). In conclusion, after a one-year follow-up of hospitalized patients, one in six reported they had not recovered well from COVID-19. Our results provide no convincing evidence of remdesivir benefit, but wide confidence intervals included possible benefit and harm.
Keyphrases
- coronavirus disease
- end stage renal disease
- sars cov
- ejection fraction
- healthcare
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- clinical trial
- type diabetes
- peritoneal dialysis
- working memory
- mental health
- randomized controlled trial
- open label
- patient reported
- study protocol
- double blind
- phase ii
- neuropathic pain
- quality improvement