Evolution of the Therapeutic Management of Giant Cell Arteritis: Analysis of Real-Life Practices over Two Timeframes (2014-2017 and 2018-2020).

Objectives: To determine how therapeutic strategies for giant cell arteritis (GCA), especially glucocorticoid (GC) management, evolved between 2014 and 2020. Patients and Methods: Consecutive GCA patients followed for at least 24 months in a single tertiary center were enrolled and separated into two groups: those diagnosed from 2014 to 2017 and those diagnosed from 2018 to 2020. GC doses (mg/kg/day) were analyzed at onset, at Month 3 (M3) and, if continued, at M6, M12, M18 and M24. Physicians' practices were also individually analyzed. Results: Among the 180 patients included, 96 (53%) were diagnosed in 2014-2017 and 84 (47%) in 2018-2020. All patients received GC at diagnosis without a difference in the initial dose between the two groups ( p = 0.07). At M3, the daily dose was lower in patients treated after 2017 ( p = 0.002). In patients who still received GC at M6 ( p = 0.0008), M12 ( p = 0.01) and M24 ( p = 0.02), the daily GC dose was still lower in patients treated after 2017. The proportion of patients who definitively discontinued GC use before M18 (42% versus 21%, p = 0.003) was higher in those treated after 2017. The rates of immunosuppressant use were not different between the two time periods (31% versus 38%, p = 0.34), but tocilizumab replaced methotrexate. Significant differences were observed among practitioners regarding the GC doses at M6 ( p = 0.04) and M12 ( p = 0.04), the total GC duration ( p = 0.02) and the ability to stop GC before M18 ( p = 0.007). Conclusions: This real-life study showed a global change in GC management over time for GCA patients, with important variability among physicians' practices.