Login / Signup

LVEF by Multigated Acquisition Scan Compared to Other Imaging Modalities in Cardio-Oncology: a Systematic Review.

Markella I PrinteziLaura I E YousifJanine A M KamphuisLinda W van LaakeMaarten J CramerMonique G G HobbelinkFolkert W AsselbergsArco J Teske
Published in: Current heart failure reports (2022)
In order to identify relevant studies, a PubMed search was performed. We included cross-sectional studies comparing MUGA LVEF to that of 2D TTE, 3D TTE, and CMR. From 470 articles, 22 were selected, comprising 1017 patients in total. Among others, this included three 3D TTE, seven 2D harmonic TTE + contrast (2DHC), and seven CMR comparisons. The correlations and Bland-Altman limits of agreement varied for CMR but were stronger for 3D TTE and 2DHC. Our findings suggest that MUGA and CMR should not be used interchangeably whereas 3D TTE and 2DHC are appropriate alternatives following an initial MUGA scan. We propose a multimodality diagnostic imaging strategy for LVEF monitoring in patients undergoing cancer treatment.
Keyphrases
  • patients undergoing
  • high resolution
  • cross sectional
  • computed tomography
  • newly diagnosed
  • ejection fraction
  • magnetic resonance
  • palliative care
  • fluorescence imaging
  • mass spectrometry
  • magnetic resonance imaging