Prognostic Significance of Lung Ultrasound for Heart Failure Patient Management in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.
Anna Panisello-TafallaMarcos Haro-MontoyaRosa Caballol AngelatsMaylin Montelongo-SolYoenia Rodriguez-CarraleroJorgina Lucas-NollJosep Lluís Clua-EspunyPublished in: Journal of clinical medicine (2024)
Background: Heart failure (HF) affects around 60 million individuals worldwide. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lung ultrasound (LUS) in managing HF with the goal of reducing hospital readmission rates. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus, covering clinical trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and original articles published between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2023, focusing on LUS for HF assessment in out-patient settings. There is a potential for bias as the effectiveness of interventions may vary depending on the individuals administering them. Results: The PRISMA method synthesized the findings. Out of 873 articles identified, 33 were selected: 19 articles focused on prognostic assessment of HF, 11 centred on multimodal diagnostic assessments, and two addressed therapeutic guidance for HF diagnosis. LUS demonstrates advantages in detecting subclinical congestion, which holds prognostic significance for readmission and mortality during out-patient follow-up post-hospital-discharge, especially in complex scenarios, but there is a lack of standardization. Conclusions: there are considerable uncertainties in their interpretation and monitoring changes. The need for an updated international consensus on the use of LUS seems obvious.
Keyphrases
- meta analyses
- acute heart failure
- heart failure
- systematic review
- primary care
- case report
- clinical trial
- magnetic resonance imaging
- randomized controlled trial
- healthcare
- physical activity
- climate change
- atrial fibrillation
- cardiovascular events
- computed tomography
- risk factors
- cardiovascular disease
- study protocol