The effect of a visuospatial interference intervention on posttraumatic intrusions: a cross-over randomized controlled trial.
Aram KehyayanJosephine P ThielKarl UnterbergVanessa SaljaStefan Meyer-WehrmannEmily A HolmesJan-Martin MaturaJan Dieris-HircheNina TimmesfeldStephan HerpertzNikolai AxmacherHenrik KesslerPublished in: European journal of psychotraumatology (2024)
Background : Intrusive memories form a core symptom of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Based on concepts of visuospatial interference and memory-updating accounts, technological innovations aim to attenuate such intrusions using visuospatial interventions. Objective : This study aims to test the effect of a visuospatial Tetris -based intervention versus a verbal condition ( Wiki ) and a never-targeted control ( no intervention ) on intrusion frequency. Method : A randomized crossover trial was conducted including N = 38 PTSD patients who had at least 3 distinct intrusive memories of trauma. After both 2 weeks (intervention 1) and 4 weeks (intervention 2), one of the three memories was randomly selected and either the visuospatial intervention (memory reminder of a traumatic memory + Tetris ) or verbal condition (reading a Wikipedia article + answering questions) was performed on their first memory in randomized order. In the week 4 session, the patient conducted the other intervention condition on their second memory (crossover). The third memory was never targeted ( no intervention ). Daily occurrence of intrusions over 8 weeks was collected using a diary and analysed using mixed Poisson regression models. Results : Overall, there was no significant reduction in intrusion frequency from either intervention compared to each other, and to no intervention control (relative risk Tetris / Wiki : 0.947; p = .31; relative risk no intervention / Tetris : 1.060; p = .15; relative risk no intervention / Wiki : 1.004; p = .92). Conclusions : There was no effect of either intervention on intrusions when administered in a crossover design where participants received both interventions. Design shortcomings and consequences for future studies are discussed.