Ovarian Cancer Translational Activity of the Multicenter Italian Trial in Ovarian Cancer (MITO) Group: Lessons Learned in 10 Years of Experience.
Daniela CalifanoDaniela RussoGiosuè ScognamiglioNunzia Simona LositoAnna SpinaAnna Maria BelloAnna CapiluongoFrancesca GaldieroRossella De CecioSimona BevilacquaPiera GargiuloEdoardo MarchesiSilvana CanevariFrancesco PerroneGennaro DanieleLoris De CeccoMezzanzanica DeliaSandro PignataPublished in: Cells (2020)
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological cancer, and despite years of research, with the exception of a BRCA mutation driving the use of PARP inhibitors, no new prognostic/predictive biomarkers are clinically available. Improvement in biomarker selection and validation may derive from the systematic inclusion of translational analyses into the design of clinical trials. In the era of personalized medicine, the prospective centralized collection of high-quality biological material, expert pathological revision, and association to well-controlled clinical data are important or even essential added values to clinical trials. Here, we present the academic experience of the MITO (Multicenter Italian Trial in Ovarian Cancer) group, including gynecologists, pathologists, oncologists, biostatisticians, and translational researchers, whose effort is dedicated to the care and basic/translational research of gynecologic cancer. In our ten years of experience, we have been able to collect and process, for translational analyses, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks from more than one thousand ovarian cancer patients. Standard operating procedures for collection, shipping, and processing were developed and made available to MITO researchers through the coordinating center's web-based platform. Clinical data were collected through dedicated electronic case report forms hosted in a web-based electronic platform and stored in a central database at the trial's coordinating center, which performed all the analyses related to the proposed translational researches. During this time, we improved our strategies of block management from retrospective to prospective collection, up to the design of a prospective collection with a quality check for sample eligibility before patients' accrual. The final aim of our work is to share our experience by suggesting a guideline for the process of centralized collection, revision processing, and storing of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks for translational purposes.
Keyphrases
- clinical trial
- phase ii
- phase iii
- study protocol
- total knee arthroplasty
- case report
- healthcare
- papillary thyroid
- end stage renal disease
- open label
- double blind
- cross sectional
- dna damage
- ejection fraction
- squamous cell carcinoma
- electronic health record
- newly diagnosed
- squamous cell
- emergency department
- quality improvement
- oxidative stress
- young adults
- deep learning
- machine learning
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- dna repair
- chronic pain
- affordable care act