Re-assessing the role of perioperative nutritional therapy in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing surgery: a narrative review.
Zoi BouloubasiDimitrios KarayiannisZoi PafiliAvra AlmpertiKonstantina NikolakopoulouGrigoris LakiotisVasilios VougasGeorge StylianidisPublished in: Nutrition research reviews (2023)
Pancreatic cancer is the most common medical condition that requires pancreatic resection. Over the last three decades, significant improvements have been made in the conditions and procedures related to pancreatic surgery, resulting in mortality rates lower than 5%. However, it is important to note that the morbidity around pancreatic surgery remains relatively high, with a percentage range of 30-60%. Preoperative malnutrition is considered to be an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in pancreatic surgery, such as impaired wound healing, higher infection rates, prolonged hospital stay, hospital readmission, poor prognosis, and increased morbidity and mortality. Regarding the postoperative period, it is crucial to provide the best possible management of gastrointestinal dysfunction and to handle the consequences of alterations in food digestion and nutrient absorption for those undergoing pancreatic surgery. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) suggests that early oral feeding should be the preferred way to initiate nourishing surgical patients as it is associated with lower rates of complications. However, there is ongoing debate about the optimal postoperative feeding approach. Several studies have shown that enteral nutrition is associated with a shorter time to recovery, superior clinical outcomes, and biomarkers. On the other hand, recent data suggest that nutritional goals are better achieved with parenteral feeding, either exclusively or as a supplement. The current review highlights recommendations from existing evidence, including nutritional screening and assessment, and pre/postoperative nutrition support fundamentals to improve patient outcomes. Key areas for improvement and opportunities to enhance guideline implementation are also highlighted.
Keyphrases
- patients undergoing
- minimally invasive
- coronary artery bypass
- poor prognosis
- healthcare
- surgical site infection
- physical activity
- risk factors
- emergency department
- stem cells
- wound healing
- coronary artery disease
- machine learning
- cardiac surgery
- human health
- risk assessment
- public health
- cardiovascular events
- atrial fibrillation
- acute kidney injury
- electronic health record
- big data
- data analysis
- cell therapy