Dopamine D 1 Agonists: First Potential Treatment for Late-Stage Parkinson's Disease.
Mechelle M LewisLauren Jodi Van ScoySol De JesusJonathan G HakunPaul J EslingerJulio Fernandez-MendozaLan KongYang YangBethany L SnyderNatalia LoktionovaSridhar DuvvuriDavid L GrayXuemei HuangRichard B MailmanPublished in: Biomolecules (2023)
Current pharmacotherapy has limited efficacy and/or intolerable side effects in late-stage Parkinson's disease (LsPD) patients whose daily life depends primarily on caregivers and palliative care. Clinical metrics inadequately gauge efficacy in LsPD patients. We explored if a D 1/5 dopamine agonist would have efficacy in LsPD using a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover phase Ia/b study comparing the D 1/5 agonist PF-06412562 to levodopa/carbidopa in six LsPD patients. Caregiver assessment was the primary efficacy measure because caregivers were with patients throughout the study, and standard clinical metrics inadequately gauge efficacy in LsPD. Assessments included standard quantitative scales of motor function (MDS-UPDRS-III), alertness (Glasgow Coma and Stanford Sleepiness Scales), and cognition (Severe Impairment and Frontal Assessment Batteries) at baseline (Day 1) and thrice daily during drug testing (Days 2-3). Clinicians and caregivers completed the clinical impression of change questionnaires, and caregivers participated in a qualitative exit interview. Blinded triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data was used to integrate findings. Neither traditional scales nor clinician impression of change detected consistent differences between treatments in the five participants who completed the study. Conversely, the overall caregiver data strongly favored PF-06412562 over levodopa in four of five patients. The most meaningful improvements converged on motor, alertness, and functional engagement. These data suggest for the first time that there can be useful pharmacological intervention in LsPD patients using D 1/5 agonists and also that caregiver perspectives with mixed method analyses may overcome limitations using methods common in early-stage patients. The results encourage future clinical studies and understanding of the most efficacious signaling properties of a D 1 agonist for this population.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- palliative care
- chronic kidney disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- randomized controlled trial
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- clinical trial
- obstructive sleep apnea
- multiple sclerosis
- risk assessment
- metabolic syndrome
- lymph node
- white matter
- high resolution
- working memory
- big data
- sentinel lymph node
- depressive symptoms
- ultrasound guided