Animacy perception in dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans (Homo sapiens): Comparison may be perturbed by inherent differences in looking patterns.
Judit AbdaiBence FerdinandyAttila LengyelÁdám MiklósiPublished in: Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983) (2020)
Perceptual animacy is the tendency for observers to represent inanimate objects as animate, based on simple motion cues. Several features of the chasing pattern can elicit animacy perception and, similarly to adult humans, dogs perceive dots showing this pattern as animate. Here, we used moving objects with a heading alignment (isosceles triangles) to investigate whether human and dog behavior continues to show similarities following such slight but important change in the pattern. We hypothesized that a heading alignment would facilitate animacy perception in both species in a similar manner. We displayed chasing and nonchasing (independent) motions side-by-side on a screen in two subsequent trials (Trial 1 and 2). Looking duration at each pattern as well as frequency of gaze shifting between the patterns was measured. Humans looked at the independent motion for longer already during Trial 1; however, dogs looked at this pattern longer only during Trial 2, whereas during Trial 1, their looking time increased toward the chasing pattern. Gaze shifting was observed in humans more often in both trials than in dogs. Although ultimate preference for the independent motion suggests rapid perception of the chasing pattern directing gaze in both species toward the "unrecognized" pattern, there was an initial interspecies difference. We suggest that different behavior across humans and dogs could be explained by ecological differences, although the role of differences in visual strategies, irrespective of perception of animacy, cannot be excluded. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).