Pharmaceutical Benefit-Risk Communication Tools: A Review of the Literature.
Dominic Hugo Patrick Balog-WayHortense BlazsinRagnar LöfstedtFrederic BouderPublished in: Drug safety (2017)
This paper reviews the main tools for communicating benefit-risk medicines information to patients that are used, or could be used, by pharmaceutical regulators. One highly successful tool from the food safety sector (front-of-package traffic-light labelling) and the mental models approach (which provides a framework for developing new tools) are also reviewed as they show great promise for being usefully adapted to the pharmaceutical context. The evolution of benefit-risk medicines communication is first contextualised within the broader risk communication literature. Three distinct goals are then made explicit before critically examining the evidence for and against tools developed in the US (e.g. at the Food and Drug Administration [FDA]) and Europe (e.g. at the European Medicines Agency [EMA]). These goals are (i) sharing information (e.g. publishing clinical trial and adverse event data online); (ii) changing patients' beliefs by conveying factual knowledge (e.g. patient information leaflets and the drugs facts box); and (iii) changing behaviour (e.g. patient alert cards and warning labels). The mental models approach and traffic-light labelling, developed outside the pharmaceutical context, are then examined. Ultimately, the paper provides a helicopter view of the variety of benefit-risk communication tools that are used, or could be used, by pharmaceutical regulators in the US and Europe.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- clinical trial
- health information
- ejection fraction
- mental health
- healthcare
- air pollution
- systematic review
- chronic kidney disease
- transcription factor
- prognostic factors
- social media
- emergency department
- randomized controlled trial
- peritoneal dialysis
- machine learning
- drug administration
- case report
- deep learning
- human health
- binding protein