Login / Signup

Triaging of respiratory protective equipment on the assumed risk of SARS-CoV-2 aerosol exposure in patient-facing healthcare workers delivering secondary care: a rapid review.

Prashanth RamarajJonathan SuperRuben DoyleChristopher AylwinShehan Hettiaratchy
Published in: BMJ open (2020)
There is a paucity of evidence on the comparison of facemasks and respirators specific to SARS-CoV-2, and poor-quality evidence in other contexts. The use of surrogates results in extrapolation of non-SARS-CoV-2 specific data to guide UK Government PPE guidance. The appropriateness of this is unknown given the uncertainty over the transmission of SARS-CoV-2.This means that the evidence base for UK Government PPE guidelines is not based on SARS-CoV-2 and requires generalisation from low-quality evidence of other pathogens/particles. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence regarding the efficacy of RPE specific to SARS-CoV-2. UK Government PPE guidelines are underpinned by the assumption of droplet transmission of SARS-CoV-2.These factors suggest that the triaging of filtering face piece class 3 respirators might increase the risk of COVID-19 faced by some.
Keyphrases
  • sars cov
  • respiratory syndrome coronavirus
  • healthcare
  • palliative care
  • quality improvement
  • cross sectional
  • coronavirus disease
  • clinical practice
  • case report
  • chronic pain
  • multidrug resistant
  • affordable care act