Login / Signup

Gene-Transcript Expression in Urine Supernatant and Urine Cell-Sediment Are Different but Equally Useful for Detecting Prostate Cancer.

Marcelino Yazbek HannaMark WinterboneShea P O'ConnellMireia OlivanRachel HurstRobert MillsColin S CooperDaniel S BrewerJeremy Clark
Published in: Cancers (2023)
There is considerable interest in urine as a non-invasive liquid biopsy to detect prostate cancer (PCa). PCa-specific transcripts such as the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion gene can be found in both urine extracellular vesicles (EVs) and urine cell-sediment (Cell) but the relative usefulness of these and other genes in each fraction in PCa detection has not been fully elucidated. Urine samples from 76 men (PCa n = 40, non-cancer n = 36) were analysed by NanoString for 154 PCa-associated genes-probes, 11 tissue-specific, and six housekeeping. Comparison to qRT-PCR data for four genes ( PCA3 , OR51E2 , FOLH1 , and RPLP2 ) was strong ( r = 0.51-0.95, Spearman p < 0.00001). Comparing EV to Cells, differential gene expression analysis found 57 gene-probes significantly more highly expressed in 100 ng of amplified cDNA products from the EV fraction, and 26 in Cells ( p < 0.05; edgeR). Expression levels of prostate-specific genes ( KLK2 , KLK3 ) measured were ~20× higher in EVs, while PTPRC (white-blood Cells) was ~1000× higher in Cells. Boruta analysis identified 11 gene-probes as useful in detecting PCa: two were useful in both fractions ( PCA3 , HOXC6 ), five in EVs alone ( GJB1 , RPS10 , TMPRSS2:ERG , ERG _Exons_4-5, HPN ) and four from Cell ( ERG _Exons_6-7, OR51E2 , SPINK1 , IMPDH2 ), suggesting that it is beneficial to fractionate whole urine prior to analysis. The five housekeeping genes were not significantly differentially expressed between PCa and non-cancer samples. Expression signatures from Cell, EV and combined data did not show evidence for one fraction providing superior information over the other.
Keyphrases