Anticipatory memory for regular and random patterns.

Real-world scenes elicit anticipatory representation in long-term memory (LTM) and working memory (WM) resulting in boundary extension (BE). Would the same results hold for nonscene patterns of objects? In Experiment 1A (LTM-paradigm), 15 regular or 15 random object-patterns were sequentially presented (10 s each); a boundary-rating-task followed. Both pattern-types elicited BE. Surprisingly, regularity (greater pattern predictability) did not enhance BE. Instead, random patterns more consistently yielded BE. Perhaps random object-groupings enhance BE (e.g., more scene-like). Objects within regular patterns were colored to create object-groupings; this increased BE compared to regular patterns without color groups, but only in 1 of the 2 tests (Experiment 1B, LTM-paradigm). In Experiment 2 (WM-paradigm), a briefly presented pattern, regular or random, was followed by a 2-s masked interval and a boundary-rating-task on each trial. Here, results reversed: patterns now elicited boundary restriction (whether or not a concurrent task had been presented to prevent verbalization). Under time pressure, without real-world layout and meaning, pattern elements may not have cohered into a unified expanse, failing to elicit BE and resulting in loss of peripheral content. We propose 2 classes of visual content that may determine anticipatory representation: content that embellishes space versus content that defines space. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).