Pulpotomy versus root canal treatment in permanent teeth with spontaneous pain: comparable clinical and patient outcomes, but insufficient evidence.
Kelvin Ian AfrashtehfarCarlos A JuradoDunia Al-HadiKrishna P ShettyPublished in: Evidence-based dentistry (2023)
This systematic review was limited by the inclusion of only two trials, indicating a lack of sufficient evidence to draw definitive conclusions. Nonetheless, the available clinical data suggests that patient-reported pain outcomes do not differ significantly between RCT and pulpotomy at Day 7 postoperatively, and that the long-term clinical success rate of both treatments is comparable, as demonstrated by a single randomized control trial. However, to establish a more robust evidence base, additional high-quality randomized clinical trials, conducted by diverse research groups, are needed in this field. In conclusion, this review underscores the insufficiency of current evidence to draw solid recommendations.
Keyphrases
- systematic review
- chronic pain
- patient reported
- pain management
- electronic health record
- neuropathic pain
- meta analyses
- radiation therapy
- squamous cell carcinoma
- spinal cord injury
- randomized controlled trial
- big data
- metabolic syndrome
- adipose tissue
- deep learning
- spinal cord
- phase iii
- postoperative pain
- placebo controlled
- study protocol