Login / Signup

Reflecting on the quality of a methodologically pluralist evaluation of a large-scale Indigenous health research collaboration in Australia.

Jodie BailieVeronica MatthewsAlison Frances LaycockKathleen Parker ConteLynette FeeneyRoxanne Bainbridge
Published in: BMJ global health (2024)
Although reflexive evaluation practice is not always comfortable, it does provide an opportunity to generate insights for improvement. Reflecting as we did-in a partnership between Indigenous and non-Indigenous colleagues-enabled deeper insights and meaning. We anticipate that our process models how other research in Indigenous contexts might better advance ethical, quality Indigenous research through working in collaboration with Indigenous researchers and communities.
Keyphrases
  • primary care
  • quality improvement
  • palliative care
  • advanced cancer