Login / Signup

Effectiveness of Naldemedine Compared with Magnesium Oxide in Preventing Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Anna OzakiTakaomi KessokuKosuke TanakaAtsushi YamamotoKota TakahashiYuma TakedaYuki KasaiMichihiro IwakiTakashi KobayashiTsutomu YoshiharaTakayuki KatoAkihiro SuzukiYasushi HondaYuji OgawaAkiko FuyukiKento ImajoTakuma HigurashiMasato YonedaMasataka TaguriHiroto IshikiNoritoshi KobayashiSatoru SaitoYasushi IchikawaHirokazu Takahashi
Published in: Cancers (2022)
Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) may occur in patients receiving opioid treatment, decreasing their quality of life (QOL). We compared the effectiveness of magnesium oxide (MgO) with that of naldemedine (NAL) in preventing OIC. This proof-of-concept, randomized controlled trial (registration number UMIN000031891) involved 120 patients with cancer scheduled to receive opioid therapy. The patients were randomly assigned and stratified by age and sex to receive MgO (500 mg, thrice daily) or NAL (0.2 mg, once daily) for 12 weeks. The change in the average Japanese version of Patient Assessment of Constipation QOL (JPAC-QOL) from baseline to 2 weeks was assessed as the primary endpoint. The other endpoints were spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) and complete SBMs (CSBMs). Deterioration in the mean JPAC-QOL was significantly lower in the NAL group than in the MgO group after 2 weeks. There were fewer adverse events in the NAL group than in the MgO group. Neither significant differences in the change in SBMs between the groups nor serious adverse events/deaths were observed. The CSBM rate was higher in the NAL group than in the MgO group at 2 and 12 weeks. In conclusion, NAL significantly prevented deterioration in constipation-specific QOL and CSBM rate compared with MgO.
Keyphrases