What are we paying for? A cost-effectiveness analysis of patented denosumab and generic alendronate for postmenopausal osteoporotic women in Australia.
Jonathan KarnonAinul Shakirah ShafieNneka OrjiSofoora Kawsar UsmanPublished in: Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E (2016)
Current Australian legislation precludes price reviews when comparator therapies come off patent. The presented analysis illustrates a review process, incorporating clinical data collected since the original submission to inform a price at which denosumab would provide value for money.