Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy-enhanced compared with treatment-as-usual for anorexia nervosa in an inpatient and outpatient routine setting: a consecutive cohort study.
Elske van den BergDaniela SchlochtermeierJitske KoendersLiselotte de MooijMargo de JongeAnna E GoudriaanMatthijs BlankersJaap PeenJack J M DekkerPublished in: Journal of eating disorders (2022)
In this mixed inpatient and outpatient cohort study, findings indicate a probability of CBT-Ebeing more effective at higher costs. These findings may contribute to the knowledge of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of specialized psychological treatments. In this study, the effectiveness and treatment costs of a specialized psychological treatment for adult clients with anorexia nervosa were compared with a regular, non-specialist treatment. One group of inpatients and outpatients did receive non-specialist treatment, the next group of inpatients and outpatients received CBT-E, a specialized treatment, later on. CBT-E is recommended for clients with bulimia and with binge eating disorder, for clients with anorexia nervosa it is less clear which specialized psychological treatment should be recommended. Results indicate that at end-of-treatment, CBT-E was not superior on remission. When looking at weight regain, CBT-E seemed superior than the treatment offered earlier. Economic evaluation suggests that CBT-E generates better health gain, but at additional costs. This study contributes to the knowledge on the effectiveness and treatment costs of psychological treatments, as they are offered in routine practice, to adults with anorexia nervosa.
Keyphrases
- anorexia nervosa
- healthcare
- systematic review
- palliative care
- randomized controlled trial
- rheumatoid arthritis
- bone marrow
- risk assessment
- physical activity
- climate change
- clinical practice
- depressive symptoms
- roux en y gastric bypass
- weight gain
- health information
- smoking cessation
- men who have sex with men
- hiv testing
- acute care