Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Algorithms for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Primary Care.
Matthew J JonesRalph Kwame AkyeaKatherine PayneSteve E HumphriesHasidah Abdul-HamidStephen WengNadeem QureshiPublished in: Journal of personalized medicine (2022)
Although familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) screening within primary care is considered cost-effective, which screening approach is cost-effective has not been established. This study determines the cost-effectiveness of six case-finding strategies for screening of electronic health records to identify index patients who have genetically confirmed monogenic FH in English primary care. A decision tree was constructed to represent pathways of care for each approach (FH Case Identification Tool (FAMCAT) versions 1 and 2, cholesterol screening, Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN), Simon Broome criteria, no active screening). Clinical effectiveness was measured as the number of monogenic FH cases identified. Healthcare costs for each algorithm were evaluated from an NHS England perspective over a 12 week time horizon. The primary outcome was the incremental cost per additional monogenic FH case identified (ICER). FAMCAT2 was found to dominate (cheaper and more effective) cholesterol and FAMCAT1 algorithms, and extendedly dominate DLCN. The ICER for FAMCAT2 vs. no active screening was 8111 GBP (95% CI: 4088 to 14,865), and for Simon Broome vs. FAMCAT2 was 74,059 GBP (95% CI: -1,113,172 to 1,697,142). Simon Broome found the largest number of FH cases yet required 102 genetic tests to identify one FH patient. FAMCAT2 identified fewer, but only required 23 genetic tests.
Keyphrases
- primary care
- healthcare
- machine learning
- randomized controlled trial
- electronic health record
- end stage renal disease
- palliative care
- clinical trial
- chronic kidney disease
- gene expression
- genome wide
- chronic pain
- wastewater treatment
- low density lipoprotein
- quality improvement
- patient reported outcomes
- health insurance
- double blind
- social media