Clinical evidence for immune-based strategies in early-line multiple myeloma: current challenges in decision-making for subsequent therapy.
Noopur S RajeMaria-Victoria Mateos-MantecaShinsuke IidaDonna ReecePublished in: Blood cancer journal (2023)
Almost all patients with multiple myeloma (MM) will eventually develop disease that has relapsed with or become refractory to available treatments and will require additional therapy. However, data are still lacking on how best to sequence regimens in the relapsed/refractory (RR) setting after the failure of early-line lenalidomide, bortezomib, and/or daratumumab, the most commonly used agents in clinical practice today. With the treatment landscape rapidly changing in response to emerging clinical trial data and approvals of several new drugs and additional combinations, it is critically important to focus on patients with RRMM. Variability in patient baseline characteristics, such as the number of prior lines of treatment, refractoriness to prior treatments, prior stem cell transplant, and timing and dosing of prior lenalidomide, makes it difficult to select the best options for patients with RRMM for whom first-line treatments have failed. The aim of this review is to provide both an overview of current therapies and future directions within the RRMM treatment landscape, and a framework for clinicians to choose the most promising next treatment option.
Keyphrases
- multiple myeloma
- stem cells
- clinical trial
- acute lymphoblastic leukemia
- clinical practice
- decision making
- palliative care
- randomized controlled trial
- combination therapy
- low dose
- acute myeloid leukemia
- case report
- diffuse large b cell lymphoma
- electronic health record
- big data
- open label
- replacement therapy
- amino acid
- current status