Login / Signup

Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web?

Achim BenditzL PulidoTobias RenkawitzT SchwarzJ GrifkaMarkus Weber
Published in: BioMed research international (2018)
This study evaluates how medical students rate the different types of teaching materials and methods available as well as possible gender-specific differences in the use of such materials. In this descriptive, cross-sectional study a questionnaire with short, one-dimensional questions with a 4-step Likert scale was developed by a presurvey within 493 students (4th year) at a University Medical School (January-December 2015). The anonymous survey was performed from July 2016 to February 2017 with 252 students within an orthopaedic surgery course at University Medical School. After exclusion of (1) nonnative speakers and (2) incomplete forms, 233 samples were included. Practical education was regarded as the most important (n=160/68.7%) teaching method followed by Internet research (n=147/63.1%) as the most important teaching material, while traditional frontal teaching (n=19/8.2%) and e-books (n=11/4.7%) ranked last. The evaluation of gender-specific differences in the use of teaching materials showed that female students prefer to highlight text (p<0.0001) as well as a trend to Internet research (p=0.053) and small-group teaching (p=0.057). Despite some gender-specific differences, traditional learning methods retain their importance besides new learning possibilities such as Internet research.
Keyphrases
  • medical students
  • mental health
  • cross sectional
  • minimally invasive
  • healthcare
  • functional connectivity
  • medical education
  • atrial fibrillation
  • coronary artery disease
  • surgical site infection